Drawing for MOBITEK

USPTO serial 76479508

MOBITEK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FISHER, HANNAH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MOBITEK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morton J. Rosenberg

MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DRSTE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURING SOFTWARE PREPARATION FOR OTHERS FOR USE IN MOBILE TELEPHONE AND TELEPHONE HANDSETS; CUSTOM DESIGN AND ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OTHERS IN THE FIELD OF TELEPHONY; DESIGN OF COMPUTERS FOR OTHERS; ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR OTHERS; DESIGN OF MOBILE TELEPHONES AND TELEPHONE HANDSETS; DESIGN OF COMPUTER CHIPS FOR OTHERS IN MOBILE TELEPHONES; DESIGN OF MOBILE TELEPHONE DISPLAYS FOR OTHERS, TELEPHONE MOBILE IMAGING AND AUDIO PROCESSING, VISUAL IMAGE SENSING MODULESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 18, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 21, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2007RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 20, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 17, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 17, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 25, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance