USPTO serial 76480155
DEF JAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AYALA, LOURDES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEF JAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brad D. Rose, Esq.
BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN & FLYNN LLP410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Non-metal banks, wastepaper baskets, garbage cans, beer jugs, beer mugs, portable beverage coolers, beverage glassware, bowls, lunch boxes, plastic buckets, ice buckets, coasters not of paper and not being table linen, coffee cups, soap containers, soap dishes, soap dispensers, all purpose portable household containers, containers for foods, thermal insulated containers for food or beverage, cups, drinking glasses, flasks, mugs, pails and plates; facial sponges for applying makeup, applicator sticks for applying makeup and stencils for applying makeup | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 28, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |