USPTO serial 76480480
SPECTRAFILE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPECTRAFILE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT
JOSEPH F SCHMIDT MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLPSTE 2000TWO PRUDENTIAL PLZ 180 N STETSON AVECHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper and paper articles, namely, pamphlets, calendars, print paper, packaging paper, and notebooks; cardboard and cardboard articles, namely, envelopes made of cardboard, postcards, and cardboard tubes; printed publications namely leaflets, periodical publications, booklets, newsletters, brochures, and newspapers for general circulation; periodicals, bookbinding's, photographs, stationery, adhesive materials, namely, sealing wax, sealing stamps; artists' materials, namely, painters' easels, paintings; stamp pads, inking pads, writing cases, pencil sharpening machines, paintbrushes, electrical and non-electrical typewriters; office requisites, namely, loose-leaf binders, arithmetical tables, stapling presses, office perforators, sealing machines for offices, paper clasps; teaching materials, namely, printed instructional and educational textbooks and workbooks; print type and cliches, document file folders, archival and file folders; cases for storage, namely, carrying cases made of paper, flip chart carrying cases, and pencil cases; paper and plastic folders; paper and plastic files; correction tape for type, correction fluid for type, correction pens; stickers; adhesive tapes for stationery or household purpose, stapling presses, namely, staplers; paper clips, thumbtacks; rubber bands; notation books, account books, comic books, dictionaries, cartoon prints, almanacs and encyclopedias; photo albums, diaries; scrapbooks, file folders made of paper; file folders made of plastic; publications, paper clasps, cards, namely greeting cards, New Year's cards, gift cards, invitational cards, birthday cards, Christmas cards; blank or partially printed paper labels; pencils, ball pens, signing pens, markers, fluorescent pens, namely, highlighting makers, drawing squares, drawing T-squares, compasses for drawing and rulers for drawing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |