USPTO serial 76481053
ROBO-FLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3230130Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 17, 2007
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ROBO-FLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Spruce Grove, Alberta, CA
Spruce Grove, Alberta, CA
Spruce Grove, Alberta, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Eric Crupi
J ERIC CRUPI MCGUIREWOODS LLP1750 TYSONS BLVDSTE 1800MCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Ball and socket joint devices with an interlocking gear teeth technology for use with various machines and/or engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
| 008 | Ball and socket joint devices with an interlocking gear tooth technology for use in attaching and/or positioning various objects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
| 010 | Ball and socket joint devices with an interlocking gear teeth technology for use with various prosthetic and/or orthotic products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Robotics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Robotics Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Medical Robotics Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ROBO-FLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |