USPTO serial 76481092
RED MAGNET MARKETING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED MAGNET MARKETING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa H. Meyerhoff
Stephanie C. Alvarez, Susan Marsillo, James A. Gal Feldman Gale, P.A.One Biscayne Tower, 30th Floor2 South Biscayne BoulevardMiami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing and direct mail consulting services for financial services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |