USPTO serial 76481237
VIGNETTE EDITORIAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOE, KELLY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIGNETTE EDITORIAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oren J. Warshavsky, Esq.
CLYDE A. SHUMAN GIBBONS DEL DEO DOLAN GRIFFINGER & VecchONE RIVERFRONT PLAZANewark, NJ 07102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Video post-production services, namely, editing of music videos, television commercials and motion pictures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |