USPTO serial 76481364
GLOBAL OFFICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLOBAL OFFICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
Malvern, PA
Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
Malvern, PA
Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC
WILMINGTON, DE
Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Glenn A. Gundersen
GLENN A GUNDERSEN CIRA CTRDECHERT LLP2929 ARCH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19104-2808Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Application service provider services, namely hosting and operating for banks, financial institutions and fiduciaries computer software used for trust administration and asset management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SUNGARD ASSET MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GLOBAL OFFICE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |