USPTO serial 76481821
ORTHOPAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORTHOPAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-81675 Munchen, DE
D-81675 Munchen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patrick B. Law
RICHARD M LABARGE MARSHALL GERSTEIN & BORUN LLC233 S WACKER DRIVESUITE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Instruments for detecting and measuring two-dimensional distribution of force and pressure; software for analyzing medical data; software for analyzing pressure distribution data and data of force measurement | ABANDONED | — |
| 010 | Orthopedic articles and implants, namely, insoles | ABANDONED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, gloves | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 26, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 3, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |