USPTO serial 76482557
QOSTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QOSTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CHUPEI, HSINCHU, TW
CHUPEI, HSINCHU, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARKSTE 300624 NINTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTERS; COMPUTER PERIPHERALS; WIRELESS/BROADBAND CUSTOMER PREMISE EQUIPMENT, namely WIRELESS LOCAL AREA NETWORK, HOME NETWORKING, CABLE MODEM/ROUTER, VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL MULTIMEDIA TERMINAL ADAPTER, E-MAIL STATION, namely DEVICE WITH HANDWRITING RECOGNITION ALGORITHM AND PS/2 KEYBOARD CONNECTION FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING E-MAIL, BROWSING THE INTERNET, SENDING DATA GATHERED FROM THE INTERNET TO A PRINTER, AND FOR RECORDING VOICE MESSAGES IN THE NATURE OF A DIGITAL ANSWERING MACHINE; DIGITAL VIDEO INTERNET AND INTERNET SET-TOP BOX, namely DEVICE WITH REMOTE CONTROL, KEYBOARD, AND MICROPHONE TO ALLOW TELEVISION SET TO BE USED TO ACCESS AND VIEW THE INTERNET AND TO RECORD AND SEND VOICE MAIL; SOHO ROUTER, namely ROUTER TO ALLOW NETWORK USERS TO ACCESS THE INTERNET VIA EITHER A HIGH-SPEED ADSL OR CABLE CONNECTION; TELEVISIONS; CAMERAS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |