USPTO serial 76482698
WHITE ONE W1
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 13, 2007
- Examiner
- DAWE III, WILLIAM H
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with WHITE ONE W1?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Barcelona 08820, ES
EL PRAT DE LIOBREGAT, BARCELONA, ES
Barcelona 08820, ES
08820 EL PRAT DE LIOBREGAT, BARCELONA, ES
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly T. Eichten
Molly T. Eichten Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren Ltd.8300 Norman Center DriveSuite 1000Minneapolis, MN 55437-1060Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Bridal wear, namely, wedding dresses | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRONOVIAS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SAN PATRICK, S.L.
- Other trademarks owned by PRONOVIAS, S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by SAN PATRICK, S.L.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named WHITE ONE W1
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 3, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |