Drawing for ROCKETMOUSE

USPTO serial 76482788

ROCKETMOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKETMOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kent E. Seton

KENT E SETON SETON & ASSOCIATES1801 AVE OF THE STARS STE 260LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer peripherals; and cursor control devices, namely, computer mouse Section 1(a);Computer input devices, namely, computer mouse, digitizer tablets, light pens, touch pads, trackballs; cursor control devices, namely, trackballs, joystick, voice-control headsets; headsets for use with computers; voice control handsets; computer keyboards; computer software for controlling input devices; (BASED ON INTENT TO USE)ACTIVEJun 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 6, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Jul 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance