Drawing for NEURODAN

USPTO serial 76482882

NEURODAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RIRIE, VERNA BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEURODAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Deluca

DIANE MELNICK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Surgical implants, namely, nerve stimulating electrodes, nerve signal sensing electrodes and signal transmitting and receiving apparatus for surgical implantation; electrical stimulation apparatus for nerve and muscle stimulation; externally-worn electronic transmitting and receiving apparatus for the control of electrical stimulation apparatus and surgical implants; mountings for externally- worn electronic transmitting and receiving apparatus and electrical stimulation apparatusACTIVE—
042development and research for others in the medical fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 15, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance