Drawing for GLASSHAUS WEB PROFESSIONAL TO WEB PROFESSIONAL

USPTO serial 76483068

GLASSHAUS WEB PROFESSIONAL TO WEB PROFESSIONAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with GLASSHAUS WEB PROFESSIONAL TO WEB PROFESSIONAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Frank

KAREN S FRANK HOWARD RICE ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO 7TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications, namely books and articles, electronic publications, namely books and articles, recorded on CD-ROM, DVD-ROM and other computer media, all in the field of computers and information technologyACTIVE—
016Stationery, books, brochures, leaflets, instructional and teaching materials and posters, all in the field of computers and information technologyACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely publication of works of others on CD in the field of computers and information technology; providing on-line and classroom training or education and conducting seminars, conferences or courses relating to computers and information technologyACTIVE—
042Providing a website over a global computer network featuring information in relation to computers and computer programming; computer programming servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance