Drawing for WIGGLE WORDS

USPTO serial 76483453

WIGGLE WORDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WIGGLE WORDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

George W Hoover

GEORGE W HOOVER BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer game software, educational software featuring instruction in language skillsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 12, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 30, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 24, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 24, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 4, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2005RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 12, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Oct 26, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 26, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 20, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance