USPTO serial 76483525
THE SHADOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, LINDA
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE SHADOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC E GISOLFI
ERIC E GISOLFI SABIN BERMANT & GOULD LLP4 TIMES SQNEW YORK, NY 10036-6526UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video game cartridges and tape cassettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Board games, card games, marbles, yo-yos; toys namely, action figures and powered and non-powered vehicles; handheld unit for playing electronic games; water guns, carrying cases for action toys and toy vehicles; stuffed plush and cloth toys; pinball machines; flying discs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 7, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 17, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |