Drawing for AIRFRAMEPOWERPLANT

USPTO serial 76483646

AIRFRAMEPOWERPLANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with AIRFRAMEPOWERPLANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John E. Russell

JOHN E RUSSELL ALLMARK TRADEMARKSTE A 4041 SUGAR MAPLE DRDANVILLE, CA 94506UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed through global computer networks in the field of aviationABANDONEDDec 30, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 21, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 21, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 3, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 25, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 17, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 19, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 12, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance