USPTO serial 76483811
NUEVO LATINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 27, 2004
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NUEVO LATINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
North Las Vegas, NV
North Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael A. Doctrow, Esquire
E&H DISTRIBUTING CO1685 W CHEYENNE AVENORTH LAS VEGAS, NV 89030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | processed beans, processed vegetables, [and cooking oil] *excluding tomatoes; and cooking oil* | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2003 |
| 030 | rice, salsa, [and tortillas] *excluding salsa containing tomatoes as the primary ingredient; tortillas* | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 25, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 7, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 24, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 10, 2006 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |