Drawing for LENDING GOOD FAITH

USPTO serial 76483944

LENDING GOOD FAITH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LENDING GOOD FAITH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew R. Basile

ANDREW R BASILE YOUNG & BASILE, PC3001 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 624TROY, MI 48084-3107UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036MORTGAGE AND HOME EQUITY LOAN SERVICES, MORTGAGE BROKERAGE SERVICES, FIRST AND SECOND MORTGAGE LENDING, EQUITY FINANCING, MORTGAGE BANKING AND REAL ESTATE BROKERAGE SERVICES AND LOAN FINANCINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 11, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 8, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance