Drawing for NETENGINE

USPTO serial 76483995

NETENGINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NETENGINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erik M. Pelton

ERIK M PELTON ERIK M. PELTON, ATTORNEY AT LAW1408 N FILLMORE ST STE 2ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for editing, creating and publishing applications; dowloadable computer software for editing, creating and publishing applicationsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 16, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance