USPTO serial 76484111
GRAND CANYON WEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PILARO, MARK F
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRAND CANYON WEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Peach Springs, AZ
Peach Springs, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shahpar Shahpar
Joseph R. Meaney Venable, Campillo, Logan & Meaney P.C.1938 East Osborn RoadPhoenix, AZ 85016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | AIRPORT SERVICES; AIR TRANSPORTATION SERVICES; ARRANGING FOR RECREATIONAL TRAVEL TOURS AND PROVIDING RELATED TRANSPORTATION OF PASSENGERS BY AIR, BOAT, RAFT, RAIL, TRAM, BUS, MOTORIZED ON-ROAD AND OFF-ROAD VEHICLES, NON-MOTORIZED VEHICLES FEATURING BICYCLES, AND DOMESTIC ANIMALS | ABANDONED | Feb 14, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2009 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 23, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 30, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |