USPTO serial 76484185
MULTIMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTIMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-79211 Denzlingen, DE
D-79211 Denzlingen, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE A. BREINER
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER, L.L.C.POST OFFICE BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power tools, namely saws, grinders, drills, milling machines, polishers, buffers, screwdrivers, sanders, routers, planers, power operated brushing machines for wire brushes, and component parts therefor, sold as a set or separately, namely supports for attaching and holding the power tool, grinding tips for grinders, saw blades, saw discs, grinding discs, sander discs, support plates for receiving and holding sander papers, milling tips, planing attachments for planers, drill bits, drill chucks, screw driver tips, grinding belts, collet chucks, belt grinder tables, wire brushes for attachment to a drill or a grinder, polishing discs, and carrying cases for the aforementioned power tools; adaptors for connecting dust bags or hoses to power tools; blasting booths for sand blasting | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 31, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 25, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 5, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |