USPTO serial 76484197
INTEGRATION H LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTEGRATION H LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sandra M. Sovinski
SANDRA M DRUMMOND MYERS & KAPLAN LLC1899 POWERS FERRY RD SE STE 310ATLANTA, GA 30339-5655UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer Consultation Services, namely providing healthcare information system provider application software information systems integration; more specifically, providing analysis and design of enterprise architecture communication infrastructure, custom software programming and implementation, and developing proprietary software interface translation engines for the simplification of processing hospital information to and from payers/providers/networks and suppliers using standard formatted message system calls across common protocol networks to enable the communication of disparate proprietary systems and the processing of transactions; providing enterprise architecture readiness assessment services, information systems architecture, and architecture framework blueprint development; providing computer project management services, data automation and collection services using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect data; providing research and development for new products for others; providing computer consultation, namely, application of computational tools and approaches for expanding the use of biological, medical, behavioral and health data, including systems and software applications development to acquire, store, organize, archive, analyze and visualize data for the purposes of providing a method for implementing information systems chargeback and information processing related services within an integral database accounting system for systems processing based on a configurable software platform that measures metered usage of applications, network resources and translation of systems messages and processes to automatically process receivables of subscribed clients through electronic banking transfers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |