USPTO serial 76484246
MEYCO FIX FIRESHIELD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- โ
- Examiner
- CARROLL, DORITT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MEYCO FIX FIRESHIELD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
TROSTBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
TROSTBERG, DE
Other trademarks owned by CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
CH-8048 Zurich, CH
CH-8048 Zurich, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph G. Curatolo
JOSEPH G CURATOLO RENNER KENNER GREIVE BOBAK TAYLOR24500 CTR RDG RD STE 280WESTLAKE, OH 44145-5681UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | cementitious flame-resistant, heat-resistant and insulating mortars, grouts, and shotcretes for use in the coating and repair of underground mines and tunnels | ACTIVE | โ |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MBT Holding AG
- Other trademarks owned by MBT Holding AG
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named MEYCO FIX FIRESHIELD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | โ |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | โ |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | โ |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | โ |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | โ |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | โ |
| Mar 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | โ |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | โ |
| Aug 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | โ |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | โ |
| Mar 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 26, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | โ |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | โ |
| Feb 9, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | โ |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Dec 31, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | โ |
| Jul 7, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 4, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |