USPTO serial 76484254
NISSHIN MILENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NISSHIN MILENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grace L. Pan
GRACE L PAN ESQ FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151-0099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | MEAT; FISH; PROCESSED MEAT; PROCESSED BEANS; PRESERVED, DRIED AND COOKED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES; JELLIES; EGGS; MILK AND MILK PRODUCTS EXCLUDING ICE CREAM, ICE MILK AND FROZEN YOGURT; EDIBLE OILS AND FATS; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING STEW OR BOUILLON; FERMENTED BEAN; TOFU; ICED TOFU; SOYBEAN MILK; PROTEIN FOR USE AS A FOOD FILLER; PREPARED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND/OR VEGETABLES; PRE-COOKED FROZEN FOODS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY AND/OR VEGETABLES; WHEY-BASED BEVERAGES | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | CURRY; TEA; SEASONING; SUGAR; SALT; MUSTARD; VINEGAR; SAUCES; SAUCES FOR PASTA AND NOODLES; SPICES; TREACLE FOR FOODS; HONEY; RICE; FLOUR FOR FOOD; PROCESSED CEREALS; NOODLES; PASTA; BOILED AND DRIED NOODLES; PRE-COOKED FROZEN FOODS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA; SANDWICH; BREAD; PASTRY AND CANDY; PREPARATIONS FOR MAKING INSTANT CAKES OR COOKIES; CAKE MIX; PREPARATIONS FOR ICE CREAMS; PREPARATIONS FOR SHERBETS; BATTER MIX, NAMELY DRY BLEND OF FLOUR, STARCH, SKIM MILK POWDER AND EGG POWDER; BREADER MIX, NAMELY FLOUR BASED BREAD CRUMB OR CRACKER MEAL; TEMPURA BATTER MIX, NAMELY BATTER MIX FOR MAKING TEMPURA; BREAD CRUMBS; PREPARED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF RICE OR PASTA | ABANDONED | — |
| 032 | CARBONATED DRINKS; MINERAL AND AERATED WATERS; NON-ALCOHOLIC DRINKS, NAMELY, FRUIT AND VEGETABLE JUICE BEVERAGES | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named NISSHIN MILENA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |