CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for PROVIAND

USPTO serial 76484390

PROVIAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PROVIAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARTHUR W. FISHER, III

ARTHUR W FISHER III A.W. FISHER III, PA5553 W WATERS AVE #316TAMPA, FL 33634UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001food preservatives and chemical preservatives containing anti-microbial compositions for use in the manufacture of food productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 18, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 14, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 19, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance