Drawing for K-9 KREATIONS GOURMET DOG TREATS

USPTO serial 76484583

K-9 KREATIONS GOURMET DOG TREATS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with K-9 KREATIONS GOURMET DOG TREATS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph P. Rejano

JOSEPH P REJANO HICKEY, CIANCIOLO, & FISHMAN, PC333 FT STDETROIT, MI 48226UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031edible dog treatsABANDONEDFeb 21, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2004ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Apr 15, 2004ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 31, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 12, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jan 8, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance