Drawing for ARTISAN FOIE GRAS

USPTO serial 76484632

ARTISAN FOIE GRAS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARTISAN FOIE GRAS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Phillip H. Kalsched, Esq.

PHILLIP H KALSCHED ESQ CARLE, MACKIE, POWER & ROSS, LLP100 B ST STE 400SANTA ROSA, CA 95401UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Pate de foie gras, foie gras, duck legs, chicken breasts, whole duck, duck fat, duck pate, duck giblets, mousse of foie gras, goose liver, goose pateACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 18, 2004MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 18, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 17, 2004LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED—
Aug 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance