USPTO serial 76484825
TRUEEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUEEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert E. Bushnell
Robert E. Bushnell Robert E Bushnell & Law Firm2029 K Street N.W.Suite 600Washington, DC 20006-1004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | IRIS RECOGNITION APPARATUS, NAMELY LENSES, CAMERAS, OPTICAL ASSEMBLIES, ELECTRONIC ACCESS CONTROLS, IRIS AUTHENTICATORS;COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR AUTHENTICATION OF IRIS; COMPUTER E-COMMERCE SOFTWARE TO ALLOW USERS TO PERFORM ELECTRIC BUSINESS TRANSACTIONS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE TO ALLOW CUSTOMERS TO ACCESS BANK ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND TRANSACT BANK BUSINESS; COMPUTER MONITORS; MAGNETIC TAPE DRIVES; COMPUTER OPERATING PROGRAMS;AND COMPUTER OPERATING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF PROCESSORS,MEMORIES, DATA STORAGE, SERVERS AND PERIPHERALS ARRANGED IN STAND ALONE CIRCUITS AND DISTRIBUTED NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |