Drawing for ENERGY CORE

USPTO serial 76484829

ENERGY CORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ENERGY CORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles M. Marmelstein

CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN ARENT FOX KINTNER PLOTKIN & KAHN, PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007ALTERNATING OR DIRECT CURRENT GENERATORSACTIVE—
011GAS WATER HEATERS, FREEZERS, REFRIGERATORS, FREEZING/REFRIGERATING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY ICE MACHINES, REFRIGERATING MACHINES, COOLING EVAPORATORS, COOLING TUBES, FREEZING/REFRIGERATING SHOWCASES, HEAT EXCHANGERS, HEATING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, RADIATORS, HOT-AIR HEATERS, AIR HEATING FURNACES, HOT-WATER HEATERS, STEAM HEATERS; AIR-CONDITIONING EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, INDUCTION AIR-CONDITIONERS, CENTRAL AIR-CONDITIONERS, WINDOW-MOUNTED AIR-CONDITIONERS; ELECTRIC PAVEMENT HEATERS, SOLAR WATER HEATERS, WATER PURIFIERS, PORTABLE ELECTRIC HEATERS, WATER FILTERS FOR HOUSEHOLD USE, WASTE WATER PURIFICATION TANKS, HOUSEHOLD WASTE WATER PURIFICATION TANKS, AND GARAGE INCINERATORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 28, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 28, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 28, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 28, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 25, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance