Drawing for Serial No. 76484918

USPTO serial 76484918

Serial No. 76484918

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76484918?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew S. Ehard

ANDREW S EHARD MERCHANT & GOULD PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrances for personal use, namely, body lotion, scented body oil, perfume, cologne, room fragrances, body wash, deodorant soap, liquid soap for hand, face and bodyACTIVE—
018Multi-purpose bags, namely, athletic bags, travel bags, fanny packs, waist packs, garment bags, beach bags, bookbags, cosmetic bags sold empty, duffel bags, shaving bags sold empty, tote bagsACTIVE—
026Novelty buttons and novelty ribbonsACTIVE—
028Sporting goods and athletic equipment, namely, tennis rackets, baseball bats; sports balls, namely, baseballs, soccer balls, and footballsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 20, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 17, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 17, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 21, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 23, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
May 23, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 23, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance