USPTO serial 76484963
PET CRAZY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PET CRAZY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cape Coral, FL
Cape Coral, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William E. Noonan
WILLIAM E. NOONAN PET CRAZY, INC.POST OFFICE BOX 07338FORT MYERS, FL 33919-0331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | pet sitting services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |