USPTO serial 76485245
INTEGRATED HEALTH PLAN, INC. THE LEADER IN NATIONAL PROVIDER NETWORKS.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3216701Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- RIRIE, VERNA BETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INTEGRATED HEALTH PLAN, INC. THE LEADER IN NATIONAL PROVIDER NETWORKS.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Belinda J. Scrimenti
Belinda J. Scrimenti PATTISHALL, MCAULIFFE, NEWBURY, HILLIARD200 S WACKER DR STE 2900CHICAGO, IL 60606-6631UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | HEALTH CARE PROVIDER NETWORK SERVICES, NAMELY, DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND ORGANIZATIONAL CONSULTATION AND MARKETING OF NETWORKS COMPOSED OF MULTI-SPECIALTY CONTRACTED PHYSICIANS, ANCILLARY HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND HOSPITALS FOR ACCESS BY THIRD-PARTY PAYORS; HEALTH CARE CLAIM NEGOTIATIONS, NAMELY NEGOTIATING FOR OTHERS OF ADJUSTMENTS TO CLAIMS FOR SERVICES PERFORMED BY OUT-OF-NETWORK HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS; REPRICING SERVICES, NAMELY REPRICING THIRD-PARTY PAYOR CLAIMS FOR OTHERS; EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION OF HEALTH CARE PROVIDER CREDENTIAL [ ; AND ADMINISTRATION OF A DISCOUNT PROGRAM FOR ENABLING DISCOUNT CARD ENTITIES, EMPLOYERS, AND HEALTH CARE CONSUMERS TO OBTAIN NEGOTIATED DISCOUNTS FROM CONTRACTED HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS THOUGH USE OF A DISCOUNT CARD ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Health Plan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Health Plan, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Integrated Health Plan, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named INTEGRATED HEALTH PLAN, INC. THE LEADER IN NATIONAL PROVIDER NETWORKS.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| Aug 4, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 22, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |