USPTO serial 76485473
WALL CONTROL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008171Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- DEJESUS, YSA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WALL CONTROL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chester J. Hosch
Chester J. Hosch SCHREEDER, WHEELER & FLINT, LLP1100 PEACHTREE STREET, N.E. SUITE 800ATLANTA, GA 30309UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Wall Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wall Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Wall Control, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named WALL CONTROL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 13, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 18, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |