USPTO serial 76485524
24PETWATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2006
- Examiner
- OSLICK, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with 24PETWATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
OAKVILLE, ONTARIO L6K 3V7, CA
Oakville, Ontario L6K 3V7, CA
Oakville, Ontario L6K 3V7, CA
Oakville, Ontario L6K 3V7, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy L. Deutmeyer
Tracy L. Deutmeyer MCGRATH, NORTH, MULLIN & KRATZ, PC LLO1601 DODGE STREETSUITE 3700 FIRST NATIONAL TOWEROMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | pet recovery services which enable pets injected with a microchip to be reunited with their owners | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PTZ INSURANCE BROKERS LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Pethealth Services Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pethealth Services Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Pethealth Services Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named 24PETWATCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 4, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 28, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |