CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EASYFLOW

USPTO serial 76485935

EASYFLOW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3195407Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 9, 2007
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with EASYFLOW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian J. McGinnis

Brian J. McGinnis BARNES & THORNBURG LLP11 South Meridian StreetIndianapolis, IN 46204-3535UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017valve of rubber for use in dispensing closures for containersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 13, 2002
020Valved dispensing closure for containers, not of metalSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 13, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 11, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 9, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 25, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Jan 25, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 8, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2009ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 9, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 24, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 4, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 5, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 24, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 24, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED—
Jul 24, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 1, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 1, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 17, 2006RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006RFRRREQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 22, 2005UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 29, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance