CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for AMODIS

USPTO serial 76485975

AMODIS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3283337Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
MAI, TINA HSIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with AMODIS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jason M. Drangel

Jason M. Drangel Epstein Drangel LLP60 E. 42nd Street, Suite 2410New York, NY 10165UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Diagnostic software for acquisition and evaluation of operating and standstill data of power plants as well as assessment and appraisal of the measured dataSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 15, 2002
042Data automation and collection service using proprietary diagnostic software to evaluate, analyze and collect operating and standstill data of power plantsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2018CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 21, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2016ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 15, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 13, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 13, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 27, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 27, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 27, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 16, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jun 27, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 27, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 18, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2006CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2006SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 13, 2006IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 13, 2006EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Sep 30, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 8, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 15, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 18, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 6, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 10, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 10, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 3, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 28, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Jan 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 28, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance