USPTO serial 76485986
MERIDIAN CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MERIDIAN CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A. Pennington
EDWARD A PENNINGTON SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP3000 K ST NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Consulting services provided to private golf clubs and golf courses in the nature of strategic planning for operation of their businesses | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 29, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |