Drawing for NATIVE AMERICAN CHANNEL

USPTO serial 76486008

NATIVE AMERICAN CHANNEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATIVE AMERICAN CHANNEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie du Laney

VALERIE DU LANEY MILLER NASH LLP4400 TWO UN SQ601 UN STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Cable television broadcasting servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Oct 13, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Oct 13, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Dec 15, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 15, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance