USPTO serial 76486061
SERAVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAIRD, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- MANAGING ATTORNEY
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SERAVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Burton S. Ehrlich
Burton S. Ehrlich LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S. Michigan AvenueSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in industry and science as well as in agriculture, horticulture and forestry, enzymes and enzyme preparations for industrial purposes; monoclonal antibodies; enzymes and biochemicals for use in the manufacture of pharmaceutical preparations and diagnostic products | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pharmaceutical, veterinary and sanitary preparations; enzymes and enzyme preparations for medical and veterinary purposes; pharmaceuticals, namely, biochemical substances used in treating, diagnosing and testing for a wide variety for diseases, disorders and conditions | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2020 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2020 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2020 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2020 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2019 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2019 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2019 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2018 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2018 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2018 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2018 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 26, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2016 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 13, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 23, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 29, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |