Drawing for PETWALLPLUS

USPTO serial 76486154

PETWALLPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2918423Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 18, 2005
Examiner
BUSH, KAREN K
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PETWALLPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Donald R. Fraser

Donald R. Fraser FRASER CLEMENS MARTIN & MILLER LLC28366 KENSINGTON LANEPERRYSBURG, OH 43551UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Non-contact wall thickness measuring gaugeSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDFeb 22, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2015CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 30, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 28, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 9, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 26, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 6, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 19, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 15, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 15, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 18, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 23, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance