USPTO serial 76486488
SWEET & CRUNCHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SWEET & CRUNCHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tracy A. Agrall
TRACY A AGRALL TRACY A AGRALL APCPO BOX 3365CLOVIS, CA 93613-3365UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Fresh vegetables, namely artichokes, Jerusalem artichokes; asparagus, eggplant, green beans, broad beans, climbing beans, dwarf beans, soy beans, beets, broccoli, Brussel sprouts, cabbage, calabrese, bell peppers, carrots, cauliflower, celery, chard, chives, squash, zucchini, summer squash, water cress, garlic, cucumbers, kale, radishes, leek, lettuce, escarole, cantaloupes, honeydew melons, casaba melons, watermelons, persian melons, okra, onions, endive, parsnips, potatoes, peas, sugar peas, peppers, Anaheim peppers, cherry bomb peppers, jalapeno peppers, habanero peppers, Thai dragon peppers, big banana sweet peppers, pumpkins, radicchio, rhubarb, shallots, spinach, spaghetti squash, acorn squash, corn, sweet potatoes, swiss chard, tomatoes, turnips, mushrooms, water chestnuts and herbs; fresh fruit, namely apples, apricots, bananas, prunes, blackberries, blueberries, cherries, cranberries, currants, avocados, figs, gooseberries, grapefruit, grapes, kiwis, lemons, limes, loquats, mangos, olives, oranges, coconuts, papayas, peaches, pears, pineapple, plum, pomegranates, quince, raspberry, strawberry, mandarins, nectarines, boysenberries, pluots, apriums, plumcots, persimmons, kumquats, carambolas | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2005 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |