USPTO serial 76486806
TOMORROW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOMORROW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Motors and engines for boats, aircraft, planes, ships | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2003 |
| 009 | Blank magnetic data carriers and recording disks; automatic vending machines; data processing equipment, namely, computers; cell phones, cameras; televisions; car stereos; radios; dub recorders, burglar alarms; blank CDs and DVD; video cassette recorders; computer search engine software, prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring movies, videos, music, library and content search engines; magnetic data carrier featuring subject matter audio video, music, movies, art, libraries; microscopes; telescopes; speakers; amplifiers; receivers; video output game machines for use with televisions; short wave radios; walkie talkies; telephones; computer color printers using heat sensitive printing process; computer printers; audio/video players and recorders; simulators; satellite; faxes; scanners; CD players; fire extinguishing apparatus; laboratory robots for personal or hobby use | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2003 |
| 012 | Automobiles; apparatus for locomotion by land, air, water and space, namely, trucks; vans; cars; family cars; concept cars; sports cars; sport utility vehicles; recreational vehicles, namely, campers and motor homes; space vehicles; aircraft; airplanes; experimental planes; cars; boats; helicopters jets; boats; ships; submarines; cruise ships; sail boats; yachts; hover craft; mopeds; mini-bikes; bicycles; buses; tractors; all terrain vehicles; snowmobiles; personal water craft, namely, small powerboats, personal jet boats, water scooters; rail vehicles, namely, locomotives and passenger cars; space craft; space craft rockets and capsules; motors and engines for land vehicles; structural parts for all of the above | ACTIVE | Feb 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 4, 2012 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 15, 2012 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2012 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2012 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 6, 2011 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2011 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 14, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |