Drawing for ANGELS NEW YORK

USPTO serial 76487044

ANGELS NEW YORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ANGELS NEW YORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

K. Clyde Vanel, Esq.

K. Clyde Vanel, Esq. Vanel Law Firm, P.C.219-16 Linden Blvd, 2nd FlCambria Heights, NY 11411UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing and shoes, namely, ties, dresses, pants, shirts, socks, hats, suits, crib shoes, baby bibs not of paper, tights, and jacketsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 14, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 15, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Oct 15, 2007OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2007WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
May 15, 2007WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 30, 2003ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 12, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 29, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 25, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 1, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2003CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance