Drawing for CIAO!

USPTO serial 76487146

CIAO!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARTY, GEORGIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CIAO!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Canned Goods, Namely, Canned TomatoesACTIVE—
030Tomato-Based Food SaucesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2006WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2006WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 29, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 29, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 17, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Oct 17, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 17, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 23, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 23, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 1, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 24, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance