Drawing for REAL TIME LEARNING

USPTO serial 76487218

REAL TIME LEARNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL TIME LEARNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sherry H. Flax

SHERRY H FLAX SAUL EWING LLP100 S CHARLES STBALTIMORE, MD 21201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041training services in the field of computer applications and technical training for businesses via the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 22, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 22, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 1, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 8, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 14, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Sep 14, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Aug 13, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 9, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance