USPTO serial 76487280
PALISADE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PALISADE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY V. LUPO
ANTHONY V LUPO ARENT FOX PLOTKIN & KAHN PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | hotels; resort hotels; inns | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 16, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |