USPTO serial 76487394
ALLER-SAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINK, GINA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLER-SAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Scarborough, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Eisen
Mark B. Eisen DIMOCK STRATTON CLARIZIO LLP20 QUEEN STREET WESTSUITE 3202, BOX 102TORONTO, ONTARIO CANADA M5H 3R3,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Mattresses and pillows; mattress toppers; mattresses, pillows and mattress toppers treated with effective antibacterial and antimicrobial allergen barrier treatments | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Duvets; mattress covers, mattress pads, pillow cases, pillow covers, pillow shams, and duvet covers; duvets, mattress covers, mattress pads, pillow cases, pillow covers, pillow shams, and duvet covers, all treated with effective antibacterial and antimicrobial allergen barrier treatments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Highland Feather Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Highland Feather Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Similar marks named ALLER-SAFE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |