USPTO serial 76487464
PROVASCIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4927684Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2016
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROVASCIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
Duncan, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
Duncan, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
Duncan, BRITISH COLUMBIA, CA
Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kirsten Severson
KIRSTEN SEVERSON KLS TRADEMARK SERVICESPO BOX 19126, 4TH AVE POSTVANCOUVER, BC V6K 4R8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements, namely, anti-catabolic supplements | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by The Nutraceutical Medicine Company Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named PROVASCIN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 29, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 23, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 25, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 23, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 3, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 16, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 24, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 13, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |