USPTO serial 76487487
GAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Chiuppano (VI), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leo M. Loughlin
Leo M. Loughlin ROTHWELL FIGG ERNST & MANBECK PC607 14th Street NWSUITE 800WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, mascara, face and body powder, night and day creams, lipstick, rouge, eye liners, foundation, eye shadow, skin cleansing preparations; bath-foam, shaving foam, aftershaves, nail polish, deodorants for men and women, hand and body soaps, hair shampoos and rinses, hair spray, hair oil, hair cream, sun tan oil, toothpaste, perfumery, namely, eau de cologne, perfume, toilet water, body spray; essential oils for personal use | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry and costume jewelry, namely, rings, necklaces, bracelets, brooches, earrings, tie clips, cuff-links, precious stones and imitations thereof, jewel cases, watches, wrist watches, clocks, alarm clocks, chronometers, watch cases, and parts therefor; trinkets; gold jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | All purpose athletic bags, attache cases, baby back packs, carry-on bags, clutch bags, duffel bags, shoulder bags, tote bags, garment travel bags, billfolds, hat boxes for travel, horse bridles, briefcases, walking canes for non-medical purposes, card cases for calling, business and credit cards, key cases, clutch purses, cosmetic cases sold empty, fur pelts, hand bags, luggage, overnight cases made of leather, back packs, passport cases, wallets, playing card cases made of leather, brief case type portfolios, pouches, rucksacks, saddles, suitcases, toiletry cases sold empty, trunks for traveling, patio and beach umbrellas, valises, vanity cases sold empty and walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bathing suits, belts, blazers, blouses, bonnets, breeches, caftans, caps, cardigans, cassocks, chemisettes, cloaks, coats, collars made in whole or part of fur, foulards, gilets, gloves, gowns, hats, hosiery, jackets, jeans, jerseys, jumpers, loungewear, mantles, neckties, night-gowns, overalls, knitwear, overcoats, blousons, pajamas, panty-hose, pants, pelisses, petticoats, pullovers, raincoats, robes, scarves, shawls, shirts, shorts, skirts, slacks, socks, stockings, stoles, headscarves, suits, sweaters, tailleurs, ties, tights, tops, trench coats, trousers, bathing and swim trunks, T-shirts, tunics, underwear, vests, waistcoats, and wind resistant jackets, boots, shoes, slippers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 30, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 23, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 22, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 18, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 15, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 6, 2009 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | 44DA | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |