Drawing for SKIN SO SMOOTH

USPTO serial 76487498

SKIN SO SMOOTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GILBERT, REBECCA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SKIN SO SMOOTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Harrison

MARK HARRISON VENABLEPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003HAIR REMOVERS, NAMELY DEPILATORY LOTIONS, CREAMS, WAXES, WIPES AND GELS; SKIN MOISTURIZERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 12, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 14, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 8, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 7, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 3, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 2, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Nov 1, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 25, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 1, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 26, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 30, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance